Client Hub →
Theme
Glossary Landing Pages

HTTP/2 vs HTTP/3

HTTP/2 and HTTP/3 are protocols that govern how browsers load web pages. HTTP/3 is faster and more reliable, especially on mobile and unstable connections.

Also known as: HyperText Transfer Protocol 2 HyperText Transfer Protocol 3 HTTP 2 HTTP 3 QUIC protocol HTTP protocol versions web page loading speed

What are HTTP/2 and HTTP/3?

HTTP (HyperText Transfer Protocol) is the fundamental technology that allows browsers to request and receive content from web servers. HTTP/2 and HTTP/3 are successive versions of this protocol, each designed to improve speed, efficiency, and user experience.

HTTP/2 was introduced in 2015 as an upgrade from HTTP/1.1, enabling multiple requests over a single connection and improving compression. HTTP/3, released in 2022, builds on this foundation using the QUIC protocol – a faster, more resilient transport layer that reduces latency and handles poor network conditions more gracefully.

Why it matters for landing pages

For UK marketing agencies, page load speed directly impacts conversion rates and SEO performance. Google's Core Web Vitals include loading performance, making these protocols essential considerations when optimising landing pages for campaigns.

HTTP/3 is particularly valuable for:

  • Mobile users: Better performance on 4G/5G networks with packet loss
  • Retargeting campaigns: Faster page transitions improve user experience
  • Video content: More efficient handling of multimedia assets
  • International audiences: Superior performance over longer, less stable connections

Key differences

HTTP/2 multiplexes requests over TCP, creating a single connection per domain. It's widely supported and sufficient for most UK-based websites, with adoption exceeding 70% globally.

HTTP/3 uses UDP via QUIC, allowing faster connection establishment and smoother handling of network interruptions. It's becoming standard for high-performance sites but requires modern hosting infrastructure and browser support.

Implementation considerations

Most modern hosting providers automatically support HTTP/2. HTTP/3 requires explicit support from your CDN and hosting partner. Content delivery networks (CDNs) like Cloudflare, Akamai, and AWS increasingly offer HTTP/3 as standard.

For agency clients running paid search and display campaigns, faster landing pages mean better Quality Scores in Google Ads and improved ROI. Testing both protocols can reveal performance gains, particularly for audiences on mobile networks.

Best practice

Ensure your hosting infrastructure supports at least HTTP/2. If your target audience includes mobile users or international visitors, investigate HTTP/3 support with your web host or CDN provider.

Frequently Asked Questions

Will upgrading to HTTP/3 significantly improve my landing page conversions?
Not necessarily on its own. HTTP/3 improves page load speed, which is one factor influencing conversions. The biggest gains come from optimising design, copy, and user experience first. However, on mobile and international campaigns, HTTP/3 can provide measurable improvements in load times and bounce rates.
Do I need to change my website code to use HTTP/3?
No. HTTP/3 is transparent to users and most website code. Your hosting provider and CDN handle the protocol negotiation automatically. Browsers fall back to HTTP/2 if HTTP/3 isn't supported.
Is HTTP/2 still good enough in 2024?
Yes. HTTP/2 remains performant for most UK websites and campaigns. Adopt HTTP/3 when your hosting provider offers it as standard, but don't delay campaigns waiting for it. Focus on other optimisations like image compression and caching first.
How do I check which protocol my landing page uses?
Use browser developer tools (press F12, check the Network tab) or online tools like WebPageTest and KeyCDN. Look for 'h2' (HTTP/2) or 'h3' (HTTP/3) in the protocol column.

Learn How to Apply This

We build websites — get a quote

Our team can put this knowledge to work for your brand.

Request Callback